MOTU application for jackson doak

[Stéphane Graber]

I was assuming my silence would be interpreted as such but apparently we
have to be explicit this time around...

+0

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:39:41AM +1100, Jackson Doak wrote:
> Can i please get a few more votes?
> 
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Jackson Doak <noskcaj at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> 
> > Has there been any activity with this while i've been gone?
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Jackson Doak <noskcaj at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > That is good, but I was hoping that you would then cherry-pick these
> >> patches into a proposed package for Ubuntu.
> >> A bzr branch with the fix and a branch with the 3.15 release (bugfixes
> >> only) have been made. I'm waiting on a semi-related theme issue.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Iain Lane <laney at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:08:17AM +1100, Jackson Doak wrote:
> >>> > Hello everyone,
> >>> >
> >>> > I would like to apply (again) for MOTU, as well as the xubuntu and
> >>> > ubuntu-gnome (or desktop-extra if that's the better one) packagesets,
> >>> at
> >>> > the next 19UTC meeting. My wiki page for this is at
> >>> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Noskcaj#MOTU . I apologise for anything
> >>> outdated on
> >>> > the page, as it is mostly just for tracking testimonials.
> >>>
> >>> OK. Here I am. I just did some sponsoring including some packages for
> >>> you.
> >>>
> >>> Scott K was asking you to take more initiative in fixing the bug I
> >>> highlighted (bug #1261608). I note you managed to cause some patches to
> >>> be written upstream. That is good, but I was hoping that you would then
> >>> cherry-pick these patches into a proposed package for Ubuntu. Then it
> >>> seems like there are theme problems. I don't expect you to know exactly
> >>> what to do about these (I wouldn't), but I would hope that you would try
> >>> to engage the developer(s) of the Ubuntu theme to seek a solution.
> >>>
> >>> It seems that you don't fully appeciate that we were trying to press you
> >>> to not leave problems unresolved. If all else fails, removing packages
> >>> from -proposed is an option.
> >>>
> >>> Having said that, the work that I've sponsored recently was of good
> >>> quality and I am pleased that you are a consistent contributor,
> >>> especially to our flavours.
> >>>
> >>> I vote +1 but I want you to pay more attention to the points I raise
> >>> above. It is okay to make mistakes, but we need to own them and work,
> >>> with others if necessary, to get them resolved.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Iain Lane                                  [ iain at orangesquash.org.uk ]
> >>> Debian Developer                                   [ laney at debian.org ]
> >>> Ubuntu Developer                                   [ laney at ubuntu.com ]
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >

> -- 
> Devel-permissions mailing list
> Devel-permissions at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/devel-permissions


-- 
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/attachments/20150225/c8edd033/attachment.pgp>