[Bug 53527] Re: Custom settings should not be a conffile

Gerv gerv at gerv.net
Fri Oct 6 14:04:58 UTC 2006


"The issue is limited though since the default custom conf is a template
and has no useful value so keeping the user version works fine"

That may be so - but how is a normal user going to know that? The "do
you want to use the old file or the new file" prompt is scary, because
neither option is guaranteed safe. "Old file" might break the app
(because it's missing essential config) and "New file" loses your
customisations.

You say that in this case, "old file" is safe - but how is a user to
know that? They aren't told so by the UI.

We need to stop gdm.conf-custom being a conffile. Surely its name
implies the user can customise it, anyway?

-- 
Custom settings should not be a conffile
https://launchpad.net/bugs/53527




More information about the desktop-bugs mailing list