[Bug 17439] gnome-pilot: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev)

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com]

Please do not reply to this email.  You can add comments at
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17439
Ubuntu | gnome-pilot





------- Additional Comments From debzilla at ubuntu.com  2005-10-10 17:46 UTC -------
Message-ID: <87mzlhic2r.fsf at becket.becket.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:14:20 -0700
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb at becket.net>
To: Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org>
Cc: 333017-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333018-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333019-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333020-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333021-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333022-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333023-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333024-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333025-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333026-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333027-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333028-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333029-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333030-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333031-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333032-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333033-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333034-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333035-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333036-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333037-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333039-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333040-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333041-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333042-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333043-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333044-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333045-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333046-maintonly at bugs.debian.org, 333047-maintonly at bugs.debian.org,
	333048-maintonly at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#333017: amaya: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev)

Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org> writes:

> Please take it under advisement that I am currently trying to persuade
> Thomas that the gdk-imlib11-dev and gdk-imlib11 packages should be abandoned
> in favor of reintroduction of gdk-imlib1 and gdk-imlib1-dev as
> libpng12-based packages.  I know a couple of you have already uploaded your
> packages to fix these bugs, which if all goes according to plan means you
> will have to *re*upload shortly to revert this change, sorry.  For the rest
> of you, I would suggest that you hold off on implementing this change until
> Thomas and I come to some sort of agreement.

This is sadly FUD.  Re-uploading is certainly unnecessary because
whatever happens, gdk-imlib11-dev will continue to be provided.

> One way or another, I do intend to reintroduce gdk-imlib1 and gdk-imlib1-dev
> to etch based on libpng12-0, so unless your package depends on libpng10-0
> directly, you shouldn't need to reupload your package for the png
> transition.

Even if this is shown to be wrong?  

Steve: can you please stop spamming everyone with each message this
way?  Instead, please respond to my messages directly.





-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.