[Bug 12281] Missing icons should have a sensible replacement

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com]

Please do not reply to this email.  You can add comments at
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12281
Ubuntu | gnome-panel





------- Additional Comments From seb128 at ubuntu.com  2005-06-30 21:54 UTC -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> The discussion about the upstream bug feels like very much aimed at the
> developers, e.g. see this line:

Free to you to try moving to somewhere else, GNOME is all about users too.


> Will Ubuntu follow Gnome in choices like these? Or is there room for different
> choices than the upstream package?

We can pick other choices (we already are doing it, upstream have no icons for
these entries, the default icon is an ubuntu patch)


> What difference would it make how much submenus are open at a time?

What is the issue to have a generic icon, why do you want to set them by submenu ?


> My main points are that there should be an icon, it should look good and it
> should represent the programs function as good as possible, which a generic icon
> doesn't.

Right, every desktop file should point to a correct icon. That's the case with
the default desktop, there is no reason to not fix other packages. We can also
make a better default icon, as said before suggestions about this are welcome ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.