[Bug 12286] Fail create image file Wrong encoding chain caracter

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com]

Please do not reply to this email.  You can add comments at
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12286
Ubuntu | nautilus-cd-burner





------- Additional Comments From meets at free.fr  2005-07-01 18:37 UTC -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > For example: 
> > file.text~
> > f?le.txt~
> oh, that. That's a nautilus feature, go to "Edition, preferences" and set
> "Afficher les fichiers caches et de sauvegarde"
That's it! thanks.
I think although that this feature should be configured natively, because an en
user could never guess what's happening with backup files, especially if not
visible.
I'm a newbee, and I saw backup files before, as a one year intensive user, now.
(Of other distributions)

> > the '?' ... (Ubuntu not supporting accentuated caracters)
> That's not Ubuntu specific, that's GNOME, and it handles non-ascii chars fine
> but they have to be UTF-8. Since hoary the default locale is UTF-8 (fr_FR.UTF-8
> for you by example) which is portable and works fine with nautilus.
Ok. This does not matter too much. I can stand using file names with no accent.
I think anyhow that with the 'dpkg-reconfigure' I already configured all the
french locales, unless I forgot one, but I don't have time to check again just now.

> > Here, you should tell me step by step what to do.
> > 1)what with gconf-editor ?
> you can changes gconf keys value with gconf editor, the key pointed says to
> nautilus-cd-burner to be verbose
Ok.
 
> > 2)should I set the debug: but what for ? 
> This bug seems to be "I have non-ascii/non-UTF-8 files and nautilus doesn't like
> that", the verbose mode would say which files are considered as incorrects by it.

> > 3)what would the 'gnome-session-remove nautilus' do ? remove nautilus ? what
> > would I do without nautilus ?   :)
> that's to get the verbose mode printed here instead of using the logs for that
beg your perdon ? 'printed here' ? printed where ? 

> > 2 questions are:
> > why are the backup documents hidden ?
> because you use this nautilus feature. Backup files are mean to be used by
> software so user are not force to have them listed.
Ok, I can see them in the GUI now. Really, it's better they would natively be
visible,
than having to configure the Edition/Préférences menu, where some end user would
not search, especially for a problem with burning. 

> > why do OpenOffice.org also created one backup file whereas usually it doesn't ?
> > and so did also one Abiword document.
> these are config options.
Might be, or might be bugs too. I have many more than one document made with OOo
or Abiword, 
and only one file of each (auto)generated a backup. One for OOo and one for
Abiword. KI did not change any configuration in one or in other of these two
applications in the meanwhile.
Though I could not file a bug report for that, with such a small sample.

> Anyway you description of the bug speaks about encoding issue which is probably
> due to some filename with non-utf8 name and no to ~ files. Do you have such
> files? What locale do you use?
I use FR-fr locales.
The problem came from the orphan backup documents. Once the backup documents
next to their parent documents again, in the same folder, the burning problem
was solved.
Thanks for your complementary informations.
Best greetings, J.M.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.