Updated certification-docs package not appearing on Launchpad

[Jeffrey Lane]

Any luck? And as Brendan mentioned, perhaps the prod stack outage us
causing this?

On Thursday, December 17, 2015, Roderick W. Smith <rod.smith at canonical.com>
wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/17/2015 01:49 PM, Daniel Manrique wrote:
> > Launchpad should always send the email, even if to say it rejected
> > the package because of $REASONS.
> >
> > At this point it looks like something is wrong with Launchpad. It
> > may make sense to ask in #launchpad (I think it's on freenode?). I
> > was about to go in and do it for you but I'd just be a middleman,
> > so I suggest you ask there directly.
>
> I've done so. No reply yet (but it's only been about four minutes).
>
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Roderick W. Smith
> > <rod.smith at canonical.com <javascript:;>> wrote: On 12/17/2015 11:43 AM,
> Daniel
> > Manrique wrote:
> >>>> This is weird. Can you try creating a PPA under your user
> >>>> (https://launchpad.net/~/+activate-ppa) and uploading the
> >>>> package there?
> >
> > Done, and no luck:
> >
> > https://launchpad.net/~rodsmith/+archive/ubuntu/testing
> >
> > I tried doing this both from my laptop (which I use for official
> > Canonical projects) and my desktop (which I use for my rEFInd
> > project, among other things). I'm getting no e-mail saying anything
> > about the files being accepted or rejected. Aside from the
> > complaint if I try uploading again, it's as if I never uploaded
> > anything.
> >
> > I also tried uploading an interim copy of rEFInd to my testing
> > PPA, and it was accepted, although the web UI says that the build
> > is scheduled for an hour from now. The fact that rEFInd was
> > accepted would tend to rule out the OpenStack outage as being a
> > cause. At this point I'm guessing there's something subtly wrong
> > with the packaging, but lintian isn't complaining, and I'm able to
> > build a package locally just fine.
> >
> >>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Roderick W. Smith
> >>>> <rod.smith at canonical.com <javascript:;>> wrote: Daniel e-mailed me
> directly
> >>>> and suggested I update the package version and resubmit, so
> >>>> I've done that, but it's still not working....
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/17/2015 11:24 AM, Daniel Manrique wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hey... I still don't see it :(
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Could you show me the output of the dput command
> >>>>>>> you're using? (if you can --debug it, all the better).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It really should appear by now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sure, here's the dput output on my end:
> >>>>
> >>>> $ dput ppa:hardware-certification/public
> >>>> ../certification-docs_0.1.4.1-0ppa1_source.changes Checking
> >>>> signature on .changes gpg: Signature made Thu 17 Dec 2015
> >>>> 11:16:51 AM EST using RSA key ID 95D058E6 gpg: Good signature
> >>>> from "Roderick W. Smith <rod.smith at canonical.com <javascript:;>>"
> Good
> >>>> signature on
> >>>> ../certification-docs_0.1.4.1-0ppa1_source.changes. Checking
> >>>> signature on .dsc gpg: Signature made Thu 17 Dec 2015
> >>>> 11:16:51 AM EST using RSA key ID 95D058E6 gpg: Good signature
> >>>> from "Roderick W. Smith <rod.smith at canonical.com <javascript:;>>"
> Good
> >>>> signature on ../certification-docs_0.1.4.1-0ppa1.dsc. Package
> >>>> includes an .orig.tar.gz file although the debian revision
> >>>> suggests that it might not be required. Multiple uploads of
> >>>> the .orig.tar.gz may be rejected by the upload queue
> >>>> management software. Uploading to ppa (via ftp to
> >>>> ppa.launchpad.net): Uploading
> >>>> certification-docs_0.1.4.1-0ppa1.dsc: done. Uploading
> >>>> certification-docs_0.1.4.1.orig.tar.gz: done. Uploading
> >>>> certification-docs_0.1.4.1-0ppa1.debian.tar.gz: done.
> >>>> Uploading certification-docs_0.1.4.1-0ppa1_source.changes:
> >>>> done. Successfully uploaded packages.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Roderick W. Smith
> >>>>>>> <rod.smith at canonical.com <javascript:;>> wrote: On 12/17/2015
> 10:37
> >>>>>>> AM, Daniel Manrique wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> The PPA still shows this version:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 0.1.3-0ppa1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> looks like something went wrong with the build
> >>>>>>>>>> process if it's not letting you upload, yet
> >>>>>>>>>> doesn't show the new version.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Could you bump your package's version to
> >>>>>>>>>> 0.1.4-0ppa2 and reupload?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've just uploaded an updated version (0.1.4.1-0ppa1).
> >>>>>>> There's no sign of it yet on the PPA's web page, but
> >>>>>>> it's only been a minute or so.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Let me know so I can keep an eye on the PPA.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Roderick W.
> >>>>>>>>>> Smith <rod.smith at canonical.com <javascript:;>> wrote: Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I recently made some changes to the
> >>>>>>>>>> certification-docs package
> >>>>>>>>>> (https://code.launchpad.net/certification-docs),
> >>>>>>>>>> which I submitted to out PPA with:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> dput ppa:hardware-certification/public
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This submission seemed to be accepted; however,
> >>>>>>>>>> it's not appeared in the PPA, and I can find no
> >>>>>>>>>> error messages in my e-mail inbox or on the PPA's
> >>>>>>>>>> web interface
> >>>>>>>>>> (https://launchpad.net/~hardware-certification/+archive/ubunt
> u/p
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>
> ublic)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> > .
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>> can build it locally and get a valid .deb file.
> >>>>>>>>>> Attempting to resubmit the package via dput
> >>>>>>>>>> results in the error:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Package has already been uploaded to ppa on
> >>>>>>>>>> ppa.launchpad.net Nothing more to do for
> >>>>>>>>>> certification-docs_0.1.4-0ppa1_source.changes
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I made my initial submission yesterday afternoon,
> >>>>>>>>>> so there's been more than enough time for the
> >>>>>>>>>> build to happen. Does anybody have any clues
> >>>>>>>>>> about what's happening, or have suggestions for
> >>>>>>>>>> finding out what's wrong? I've done this before,
> >>>>>>>>>> albeit not very often, so I doubt if it's a
> >>>>>>>>>> permissions issue.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -- Checkbox-devel mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>> Checkbox-devel at lists.ubuntu.com <javascript:;> Modify settings
> >>>>>>>>>>> or unsubscribe at:
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/checkbox-devel
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> - --
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> Rod Smith
> Server and Cloud Certification Engineer
> rod.smith at canonical.com <javascript:;>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWcwdYAAoJEFgyRI+V0FjmoWoH/0Og1ccj4sn4GuX49EEvnE+2
> cTfIxbQl+7MnkXn6VWsfXiZDrNPSC/NErQwOaYzMNbI1DliLNZ1Kve1p7ZlFz68J
> UhWuhVLGlzVGxqlLnK/kuaoWiPkIabNSqPH3AK+cWtCaLHXqxVPY1Gsg0ADGyYgB
> 1Vl74GmfpUfaPmLNGCdTtteDLP0ryNli0C3Y6VQPdKKh4aRMdSEg45kQYj46+d59
> TiXOiCDuRW4mRvD/NA/uAsr7WIYX6RqHhJgdFTX2f+cH4U5OG45l0p4eu3FWruq5
> tIiNeNZVAs4o8QpGiB/M4p0snHix06AI6RzK+7QiKkSF+HUnKvlICRX3RekTt4Q=
> =lZEl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Checkbox-devel mailing list
> Checkbox-devel at lists.ubuntu.com <javascript:;>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/checkbox-devel
>


-- 
Sent from my iPhone so please forgive any typos, top posting and such.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/checkbox-devel/attachments/20151217/7d098326/attachment-0001.html>