<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> On 21/10/11 3:01 AM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bazaar-request@lists.canonical.com">bazaar-request@lists.canonical.com</a> wrote: >>> > > So the big question is ..... why use Bazaar instead of Mercurial ?? >>> > > Given Bazaar is no where near as widely used, what makes Bazaar so >>> > > different, so much better, that I should stay with Bazaar ?? >> > There are probably other significant advantages (and maybe some of these >> > are inaccurate or out of date), but I hope that gives some assistance. > Also see the much better written answer at > <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc1738" href="http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/why-switch-to-bazaar.html"><URL:http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/why-switch-to-bazaar.html></a>. Thanks everyone. You've all been a great help. I am now convinced to stick with Bazaar (at least until I find that it doesn't work for me -- which is unlikely). I can use either bzr-git or bzr-hg to access BitBucket :) Next big question. Is one better than the other ?? What are the pros/cons ?? <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bzr.bz">http://bzr.bz</a> does look good now. It looked very cheap and like one man shop operating a server from home, but it now looks more professional. It's still commercial with a minimum of $10pm. Very cheap for a business, but still free is better for very small companies, startup companies, etc. Finally, do you think there is a possibility that BitBucket would support Bazaar natively ?? Maybe SFTP or some other remote filesystem based access is do able?? Then again, might be able to do that with other sites that offer free/cheap disk space ?? Thanks, Brendan. </body> </html>