<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Martin Pool <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mbp@canonical.com">mbp@canonical.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 30 September 2010 10:17, Philip Peitsch <<a href="mailto:philip.peitsch@gmail.com">philip.peitsch@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Everyone,<br>
><br>
> Just a quick warning that if you are using bzr-svn, updating from 2.2.0 to<br>
> 2.2.1 may not be as safe as I first hoped. At least 5 of the devs I work<br>
> with have found their local repositories now suffer from<br>
> <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/485601" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/485601</a> when attempting to check files<br>
> into a remote repository running bzr 2.1.1. Note this may not affect<br>
> "normal" bazaar workflows, as we make heavy use of bzr-svn, and most of our<br>
> synchronization happens via an svn trunk, rather than peer-to-peer bazaar<br>
> sync'ing.<br>
<br>
</div>Hi, thanks for the heads up.<br>
<br>
Just to be clear, you're saying the bzr+ssh server was running 2.1.1<br>
the whole time, and the clients upgraded from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1?<br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">Martin<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>The server itself is running debian lenny, with bzr 2.1.1 manually
installed. All the clients are running via bzr+ssh on Windows boxes (both XP & 7). We are running a mix of 2.1.1, 2.1.2 &
2.2.0 depending on how adventurous the particular dev is :). I'm
working with the dev's at the moment to get all local copies of the
repositories deleted, as we have a network shared repo they all use as
well which I will be running the reconcile --canonical-chk business on
tonight.<br><br>I thought it'd be gratifying for you guys to hear that in spite of this hick-up (our second major one in two months... the last one was caused by another bug), the devs are still pretty keen on continuing on with bazaar if I can get things repaired. I thought that after a second local repo loss a few users might be a little gun-shy, but most still feel the pro's far outweigh the con's... so congrats to all you devs for the powerful tool you've built!<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Philip Peitsch<br>Mob: 0439 810 260<br>