<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Ben Finney wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:87sk87w1ro.fsf@benfinney.id.au" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">David Muir <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:davidkmuir@gmail.com"><davidkmuir@gmail.com></a> writes:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Since (from my experience) reverse cherry picking is usually done
within the current branch, shouldn't merge run off of :this instead of
:submit?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I don't think that would be any less confusing; the default branch
shouldn't differ depending on how I'm specifying revisions.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yeah, I don't really like idea either, it's just that I can't think of
a case where I would reverse cherry pick from a different branch.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:87sk87w1ro.fsf@benfinney.id.au" type="cite">
<pre wrap=""></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Also, it would be good if the docs mention that merge uses :submit as
its default. Even in the docs for the submit_branch config setting, it
only mentions that it's used by `bzr send`.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Rather, if the docs are misleading on this, I think it's the docs that
need changing.
Could you make a patch that makes them clearer on these two points?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Will have a crack at it.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
David<br>
</body>
</html>