<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Stefan Monnier wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:bc7f6f3eea8d43dec676f1924a407d52,jwv8wbiqm57.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general@gnu.org" type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> * MAJOR ISSUE: This requirement is open to abuse, as anyone could send such an email with my name in it without my knowledge and it is easy to falsify sender's addresses in email as huge amounts of spam can prove. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">As Karl(?) mentioned, if a miscreant forges mail purporting to be from you, you obviously are not accountable for what they say. </pre> </blockquote> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">No, but Canonical won't pay my legal fees, court costs, and any incidental costs of proving I sent no such mail. And I personally would have great difficulty proving that, since I don't habitually sign my email. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> But this issue exists regardless of whether you ever get even close to signing such an agreement. It could happen even if you've never heard of this agreement and its clauses. So if there is a problem, it's in the legal system, which should hopefully lay the burden on Canonical to show that they really did get a valid agreement from you, rather than lay the burden on you to show that you did not sign any such agreement. Stefan </pre> </blockquote> This issue seems to have escalated from my initial remark. I agree that the present legal system is at fault and is often very unfair - lack of a robust defence can be seen to admittance of guilt - but it is this legal system that can cause us great pain, and it is this same legal system that such an agreement works within. May I suggest that, just with other places where one is requested to sign up for something (e.g. a forum), that an email to the sender's email address requesting a confirmation (by following a link) would go a long way towards verifying that the initial email was from the right person. The technology exists, is well known and does not impose any real burden on the contributor. Greetings, David. <div class="moz-signature">-- <meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; "> <title></title> <style type="text/css">  </style> David Ingamells Test Architect Mapscape Henri Wijnmalenweg 5b | 5657 EP Eindhoven | The Netherlands Phone +31 (0)40 7113571 | Fax +31 (0)40 7113599 <a href="http://www.mapscape.eu/">www.mapscape.eu</a> Mapscape B.V. is ISO9001:2008 certified. This e-mail and any attachment may contain corporate proprietary information and may only be read, copied and used by the intended recipient. If you have received it by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your system. We believe but do not warrant that this message and any attachments are virus free. Mapscape B.V. is registered at the Kamer van Koophandel Oost-Brabant located in Eindhoven, The Netherlands number 17210210. </div> </body> </html>