<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Krzysztof Nowicki <<a href="mailto:krissn@op.pl">krissn@op.pl</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Voelker, Bernhard pisze: <div class="im">> But I got a major difference between CC and bzr: > In "normal" (i.e. dynamic views), it's not possible to change a file > without a "checkout"; checkout of a file means "tell the CC server that > I'm gonna change that file" and usually the file is locked for concurrent > checkouts (unless -unreserved given). > </div>BTW, I wonder if it would be possible to implement the concept of a "dynamic view" in Bazaar (using fuse for example?). It would be a hell of a hack though ;) K. </blockquote><div> My company uses ClearCase. I will neither praise nor bury ClearCase here. What I will say is that the complexity (and high cost) which comes with managing ClearCase is a primary reason why some of our teams have already moved to bzr. Elegant ease of setup and use is one of the greatest strengths of bzr. More tools to facilitate migration from ClearCase to bzr would be welcome, and I would treat that as a one-way trip. I don't plan to ever look back. My opinions are based on my experience. YMMV. ~M </div></div>