<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Robert Collins <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robertc@robertcollins.net">robertc@robertcollins.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<div class="im"><br>
Maritza Mendez wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi Robert, I have some real bzrlog data now.<br>
><br>
> As described, we were running bzr 1.17 when the original problem<br>
> occurred. Following your suggestion, and after making backups of the<br>
> affected repo, I took us to bzr 1.18. We ran 'bzr check' on the repo<br>
> both before and after instralling bzr 1.18. The 'bzr check' using bzr<br>
> 1.17 reported no problems. After installing bzr 1.18, 'bzr check'<br>
> reported 91 "Missing inventory" messages. 91 is an interestingnumber,<br>
> because it is also the number of revisions in the branch.<br>
><br>
> I am attching the bzrlog output showing two checks -- the first with bzr<br>
> 1.17 and the second with bzr 1.18. I have made string substitutions to<br>
> redact user and domain names, withotu affecting the meaning of the results.<br>
><br>
> I am interested to learn what these results mean if you have time to<br>
> offer an interpretation.<br>
<br>
</div>The missing inventory output is a harmless but disturbing bug in check,<br>
fixed in trunk and 2.0rc2 [probably rc1, but don't use that :)].<br>
<br>
- -Rob<br>
<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Thanks for the good news and more thanks for the fix on the way. I understand (maybe too well) that some scary messages are unavoidable. So when one goes away, I really appreciate it.<br><br>~M<br>
</div></div><br>