<br>Let me try that again. Gmail hit send for me somehow...<br><br>The plugins nominated for "required compatibility" could be<br><br>bzrtools -- I assume this is not controversial<br><br>qbzr -- GUI is essential to winning the hearts and minds of a lot of people who presumably would benefit from bzr and help bzr grow<br>
<br>bzr-svn -- it only takes one bad migration experience for people to never try a product again SVN is the big dog. So focus on it.<br><br>-M<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Maritza Mendez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martitzam@gmail.com">martitzam@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>Pardon me if this has been addressed.<br><br>Is there a document which states which plugins are so important that a bzr build must pass compatibility testing against them before bzr can be released as a stable release? <br>
<br>If not, I would nominate the following plugins for "required compatibility" status (in no particular order):<br><br>bzrtools<br>
</blockquote></div><br>