<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Robert Collins <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robert.collins@canonical.com">robert.collins@canonical.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
So 'bzr check' currently takes parameters allowing control of checking<br>
repo/branch/tree. Are there actual use cases for this?<br>
<br>
<br>
I'd like to have check just check whatever is present [and do it quickly<br>
yada yada yada].<br>
<br>
-Rob<br>
</blockquote></div><br>As a user of bzr in production environments, I will tell you that taking shortcuts in integrity tests of any kind is almost never a good choice. If checking my repo/branch/tree (s) takes hours, it's worth the peace of mind that comes from a cron job. <br>
<br>It's fine if there are options to selectively disable tests, but the default should be to check everything that is checkable. This protects the naive and empowers the experts.<br><br>-M<br><br>