<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi!<br>
<br>
What I am about to ask is related to SVK, but I'm not doing feature
comparisons here...<br>
<br>
What I am doing now is that if I want to do offline Subversion
development, this is what I do:<br>
<ol>
<li>The Subversion repository is hosted remotely</li>
<li>I created a local Subversion repository</li>
<li>I create an SVK depot, which has two mirrors: the remote
Subversion, and the local Subversion</li>
<li>I merge from remote to local Subversion repository, using SVK's
help</li>
<li>During development I use regular Subversion tools (subclipse,
netBeans, tortoise, anything)</li>
<li>When I'm ready to push or pull changes I merge between remote
& local with the help of SVK</li>
</ol>
That development workflow is to me, very practical and I really like it
now. The reason is it allows me to work with all Subversion tools, I
don't have to wait long times just to do a commit. And when it's time
to take coffee break, I'll sync/push/pull the repositories for good. :-)<br>
<br>
What I want to ask is, is that development workflow appropriate using
Bazaar?<br>
<br>
So, in my view, Bazaar can also be used as "middle-man" between two
Subversion repositories (remote & local). However I'm not sure if
anybody has done this before.. I would appreciate testimonials...<br>
<br>
In case anyone interested about my SVK workflow, feel free to contact
me. I might even write a blog post about it just for you. (SVK's
typical workflow uses only one mirror, and uses SVK tools and commands,
not Subversion's; so my approach is rather in the narrow market)<br>
<br>
(PS: I'm not an SVK developer nor evangelist, I'm just trying to find a
nice distributed development approach that makes it easier for all our
team members...)<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Hendy Irawan
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.hendyirawan.com">www.hendyirawan.com</a></pre>
</body>
</html>