<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/20/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Alexander Belchenko</b> <<a href="mailto:bialix@ukr.net">bialix@ukr.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<br><br>James Henstridge пишет:<br>> On 19/02/07, Joseph Wakeling <<a href="mailto:joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net">joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net</a>> wrote:<br><br>> A flag for rm/remove sounds good to me, but I'd suggest using "bzr rm
<br>> -f" instead. Both CVS and Subversion use -f or --force for "unversion<br>> + delete", so it seems silly to implement the same feature but pick a<br>> different name without a good reason.<br>
<br>Yes. Here the answer that Marius expect, I think.<br></blockquote></div>indeed.<br>Thanks to everybody's comments I think we are making some progress.<br><br>I would have thought -f & --force should be for "don't ask questions".
<br>Do anybody have objections for using -f ?<br>I'd prefer the -d & --delete, but for consistency's sake I'm ok with -f & --force<br><br>Does anybody object to having the extra commands 'bzr del' & 'bzr delete' ?
<br><br><br><br>thanks<br>marius<br>