fair enough, but it is still fun coming up with them! (I'll stop bugging you now) I personaly don't want to use another vcs again, if I have it my way. <div>On 1/8/07, James Henstridge <<a href="mailto:james@jamesh.id.au">james@jamesh.id.au</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 08/01/07, Marius Kruger <<a href="mailto:amanic@gmail.com">amanic@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > === modified 'VCS' > -cvs > -subversion > +bazaar There are a few problems with suggestions like this: 1. the reader needs to know what CVS and Subversion are in order to understand what it means. 2. it is unnecessarily divisive.  The people most likely to try out Bazaar probably already have a favourite VCS, and may be turned off if their first exposure to Bazaar is a t-shirt saying how bad that VCS is. 3. With great tools like bzr-svn, tailor and the Launchpad vcs-imports, it isn't an exclusive situation: Bazaar can make you more productive when contributing to projects using a Subversion mainline. They don't have to give up their current infrastructure to try Bazaar. James. </blockquote></div> -- I code therefore I am.