<span style="font-weight: bold;">+1 for 5 min default timeout:</span><br>
<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">The cronscript use case is interesting, but I think it is rare enough<br>that the default should be to block if not forever, then at least for a
<br>"very long time", like 6 hours.<br></blockquote></div>* <span style="font-weight: bold;">cron scripts are definitely not isolated/rare use cases</span><br>
* I'd rather let it timeout and maybe retry later <br>
(could be specified with commandline parameter like --max-retires=3)<br>
* If nothing happened in 5 minutes, something is probably wrong,<br>
and would probably require the user to retry or do something.<br>
* Infinity is a very long time. Non terminating tasks is a big no no, especially on servers.<br>
* 6 hours is way too long too, the script must actually fail/[terminate with message] if something is wrong<br>
and if nothing happened in 5 minutes something is probably wrong.<br>
<br><br>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">+1 for globally/user configured timeout</span><br>
* seems like the timeout differs per user case rather than per branch:)<br>
* a specific site (like at home or at work) has certain network constraints <br>
(like dial-up or broadband) not the branch.<br>
<br>
<br>
my 2 cents worth<br clear="all">Marius<br>-- <br>--<br><br>The source is strong in this one.