<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/27/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matthieu Moy</b> <<a href="mailto:Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr">Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Robert Collins <<a href="mailto:robertc@robertcollins.net">robertc@robertcollins.net</a>> writes:<br><br>> What about 'bzr gui' ? :)<br><br>I'd prefer a more neutral name, to leave room for other GUI if someone<br>
wants to write some.<br><br>It depends on whether you want a canonical GUI (... is _the_ gui for<br>bzr), or just one (... is _a_ gui for bzr). I'd rather have no<br>canonical GUI, since GUI's are something that rarely make everyone
<br>happy. If you make a gtk GUI, KDE users will complain that it's hugly,<br>and vice versa, ...</blockquote><div><br>KDE UI will also exist. <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Availability of _a_ GUI seems a key point for bzr adoption, but a<br>canonical (I mean, "official", not the company name) GUI is not IMHO a<br>good thing.<br><br>(see a thread about this on Mercurial's ML some time ago)
<br><br>--<br>Matthieu<br><br></blockquote></div><br>