Bazaar 2.6.0 for Windows?

Chris Hecker checker at d6.com
Fri Nov 1 16:47:02 UTC 2013


Yeah, I agree, it just looks bad that there isn't a windows installer on
the site for the latest.

Is the launchpad project up to date?  Are there instructions that can be
followed relatively easily?  It looks bad that there's no 2.6 installer,
but it'd be worse to have a bad installer get up there.  If it's easy
enough I could maybe do it, assuming there were enough people to help test
it.

Who built the last one?  Couldn't that person do the new one easier than
anybody?

Chris

PS. The website is always so slow for me, is it for everybody?
 On Nov 1, 2013 9:07 AM, "Matthias Kluwe" <mkluwe at gmail.com> wrote:

> Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer <at> samba.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:31:06PM +0000, Matthias Kluwe wrote:
> > > Joshua Judson Rosen <jrosen <at> harvestai.com> writes:
> > > > I notice that Bazaar 2.6.0 has finally been released. Is there going
> to be a
> > > > Windows installer uploaded for it soon?
> > > >
> > > > I have a colleague on Windows who's interested in switching over to
> Bazaar
> > > from
> > > > Subversion (and TortoiseSVN), and I figured I might as well give him
> the
> > > latest
> > > > stable release, but it looks like the latest stable release
> available as a
> > > > Windows installer is 2.5.1. I don't see a 2.6-series Windows
> installer
> since
> > > > 2.6b1 (i.e.: I don't see one for 2.6b2 or 2.6.0).
> > >
> > > ... and still there is none
> > >
> > > I'm more or less the last person to demand a free software project to
> provide
> > > a binary installer, and being a Linux user since the last century I'm
> writing
> > > this with some bad conscience, but *at work* I have to use Windows...
> > >
> > > One major point for the decision to use Bazaar instead of the
> competitors was
> > > the availability of a pre-packaged installer and the bundled Bazaar
> Explorer
> > > that came with it and made the functionality accessible almost
> instantly for
> > > all co-workers.
> > >
> > > I must admit that I don't have the resources to build the installer
> here. If
> > > I've interpreted the page Win32 Installers for Bazaar[1] correctly,
> the is
> > > a project on launchpad[2] dealing with this topic.
> > >
> > > How up to date is this? Looking in the top level TODO.txt, this is
> headed with
> > > "Things to do for the Bazaar 2.2 installer".
> >
> > 2.6 had a number of bug fixes, but introduced no major speed
> improvements or
> > new features. Do you actually need 2.6.0 (because it fixes a particular
> bug
> > you're hitting), or would 2.5.1 suffice as well?
>
> Hmm, I really wanted to write this, but I forgot it during the editing of
> my
> message:
>
> We're currently using 2.5.1 here, and are perfectly happy with it. The
> installer came along with qbzr 0.22.3 and the only bug I know is a rare
> case
> invoking qlog including a revisionspec on a file that does not exist
> anymore
> in the working tree. (I have not found the time to construct a minimal
> example to reproduce this and `bzr log` works fine.)
>
> My main concern (apart from the fact that I *like* updating...) is that it
> looks wierd not offering the latest release on the download page -- the
> Windows download is mentioned *first* on http://bazaar.canonical.com/en/...
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20131101/3d5a88a8/attachment.html>


More information about the bazaar mailing list