"bzr branches" broken?

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 09:08 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Is it me, or did the latest versions break "bzr branches"?  In my
> local branch I get this:
> 
>   D:\gnu\bzr\emacs\emacs-24>bzr branches
>   * (default)
> 
> And if I do the same with the repository, whether remote or shared
> local, I get an empty response.
> 
> Looks like it tries to report co-located branches instead?  Is this a
> bug?  Should I report it (and if I do, will someone fix it)?
This is the new branches command that is part of bzr itself (rather than
bzrtools) and reports colocated branches by default. For behaviour
similar to what you were used to (dead slow on remote locations),
specify -R.

Cheers,

Jelmer