BZR 2.1.2 + SVN 1.7.7 + etckeeper on Debian Squeeze

[Václav Zeman]

On 11/03/2012 04:55 AM, JP Vossen wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 07:33 PM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 16:42 -0400, JP Vossen wrote:
>>> But...  If I do have both .svn and .bzr, how do I choose which 'bzr'
>>> will use?  (I *am* going to have that situation at $WORK soon, though
>>> that'll be on Windows (yuck).)
>>
>> There is no way to pick one over the other; there isn't a particular
>> reason to have both version the same directory - that's what bzr-svn is
>> designed to handle.
> 
> My reason for having both .svn and .bzr is simple--in-line SVN + BZR. As
> detailed in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2012q2/074983.html
> I'm already doing that with great success with CVS + BZR, but we're soon
> switching to SVN despite my strong push for BZR.
> 
> SVN is OK (anything is better than CVS), but I prefer to use BZR, so
> I'll use both.  SVN will be read-write to the public/production repo and
> my actual daily work will be in BZR.  Thus I guess my solution will be
> to remove or disable the bzr-svn plugin.
I am not sure that I fully understand your situation but why cannot you
use BZR only, that is why cannot you use BZR as a Subversion repository
client? IIRC, it requires you to be careful about what you push upstream
into SVN repo but it is doable.

-- 
VZ