treeless branches + lightweight co-s or colocated branches
Gour
gour at atmarama.net
Wed Jun 20 09:28:32 UTC 2012
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:09:15 +0200
John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
> It doesn't change the storage format, and the branches and structure
> is actually backwards compatible. (older bzr can commit/pull/push/etc
> in a colo setup, it just doesn't know how to switch to individual
> branches, etc.)
I discussed it with Jelmer on IRC...the confusion is due to:
gour at atmarama ~> bzr init -h | grep format
-v, --verbose Display more information.
Branch format:
--format=ARG Specify a format for this branch. See "help
formats". --development-colo The 2a format with experimental support
for colocated --pack-0.92 Pack-based format used in 1.x series.
which makes me think that using colo branches requires
--development-colo storage format.
It seems, based on the info I got, that this is not true?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
The embodied soul may be restricted from sense enjoyment,
though the taste for sense objects remains. But, ceasing
such engagements by experiencing a higher taste,
he is fixed in consciousness.
http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20120620/347bf995/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the bazaar
mailing list