treeless branches + lightweight co-s or colocated branches

Gour gour at atmarama.net
Wed Jun 20 09:28:32 UTC 2012


On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:09:15 +0200
John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:

> It doesn't change the storage format, and the branches and structure
> is actually backwards compatible. (older bzr can commit/pull/push/etc
> in a colo setup, it just doesn't know how to switch to individual
> branches, etc.)

I discussed it with Jelmer on IRC...the confusion is due to:

gour at atmarama ~> bzr init -h | grep format
  -v, --verbose         Display more information.
  Branch format:
    --format=ARG        Specify a format for this branch. See "help
formats". --development-colo  The 2a format with experimental support
for colocated --pack-0.92         Pack-based format used in 1.x series.

which makes me think that using colo branches requires
--development-colo storage format.

It seems, based on the info  I got, that this is not true?


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
The embodied soul may be restricted from sense enjoyment, 
though the taste for sense objects remains. But, ceasing 
such engagements by experiencing a higher taste, 
he is fixed in consciousness.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20120620/347bf995/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the bazaar mailing list