treeless branches + lightweight co-s or colocated branches

Gour gour at atmarama.net
Wed Jun 20 07:22:27 UTC 2012


On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:48:01 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:48:01 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:

> Because people pick setups that are familiar, and end up implementing
> a CVS workflow with a tool that doesn't have the flaws the drove the
> "best practices" with CVS.  It makes things appear complicated,
> especially to new users (more complicated than they actually are, most
> would say), and makes writing good documentation difficult.    

Well, with the exception of git in which I'm simply not interested, I
tried and used several DVCS-es and find that Bazaar is the most
intuitive to me and the easiest to use after Darcs.
 
> Finally, it tends to make some areas of development more difficult
> because that flexibility needs to be preserved.  

That *might* be the case, but as an end-user, I simply do not feel
it. ;)


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
Whenever and wherever there is a decline in religious practice, 
O descendant of Bharata, and a predominant rise of irreligion — 
at that time I descend Myself.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20120620/7fad5ec1/attachment.pgp>


More information about the bazaar mailing list