treeless branches + lightweight co-s or colocated branches

[Gour]

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:32:28 -0500
Neil Martinsen-Burrell <nmb at wartburg.edu> wrote:

> If having the repository in a different location is important, then
> lightweight checkouts of a treeless repository is ideal.   

Yeah, I have use case for that and I like it.

> (This flexibility in setup is one of Bazaar's strengths...and
> weaknesses).  

Why weakness?

Isn't it Bazaar's virtue?

> bzr-colo is alive and well and I will continue to maintain it to
> provide colocated branch functionality for versions of Bazaar before
> 2.6.  I had hoped to be able to easily map the bzr-colo UI on top of
> Bazaar's new colocated branch functionality, but that has been more
> work (and I have had less time) than I expected. Instead, I think that
> the best way forward is when the UI for colocated branches matures in
> bzr 2.7, that I will recommend people to use that instead, although
> bzr-colo's version of colocated branches will continue to work as
> well.  

Thank you for clarification.


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
From wherever the mind wanders due to its flickering and unsteady 
nature, one must certainly withdraw it and bring it back under 
the control of the self.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20120620/4ec8f499/attachment.pgp>