Release testing and the relationship between 'bzr selftest' and plugins
jelmer at samba.org
Fri Mar 16 16:35:29 UTC 2012
Am 16/03/12 17:11, schrieb Vincent Ladeuil:
> >> The osx installer (and the windows installer too AFAIK) has a script to
> >> download from a branch (tip) or a tag or a revid, so it's just a matter
> >> of providing either a branch (during betas) or a tag for stable
> >> releases.
> > We still had out of date plugins in the installer, though.
> Yeah, the process is still not polished enough :-/
> Ideally, at least osx and windows, should share their scripts (or
> release definitions) so we can update it in a single place.
> More and people are submitting merge proposals just for bumping which
> version of a plugin should be packaged.
> I think that's the good trend and we should probably help it becoming
> the official way to get packaged.
Do you mean that plugin authors should submit updates to the installers?
I've updated the versions of bzr-svn/bzr-git in the installers a couple
of times, but I would really rather stay away from this. It takes time
(and releasing already takes up enough time) and I don't have the
environment to test my changes in.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the bazaar