root-ids changing for some merges

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11-07-07 06:29 AM, vila wrote:
>>>>>> Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:
> 
>     > On 11-07-06 11:55 AM, vila wrote:
>     >>>>>>> Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:
> 
>     >> > It's not helpful to repeat this without the *why*.
>     >> 
>     >> Hence that test added at the end of the mail you're replying to so you
>     >> can see for yourself: confusing and useless renames. I'd rather keep the
>     >> root-id and avoid them completely.
> 
>     > Yeah, but the repetition isn't helpful.  I already knew what you
>     > wanted.
> 
> Why asking then ?

I was asking for the why.  I was making the point that "It changes
behaviour" isn't a good reason to revert a change.

You kept saying "it changes behaviour", which made no sense to me.  I
expected it to change behaviour.  I said it changed behaviour.  You
approved it, having seen that it would change behaviour.  And most
branches change behaviour.

> Hope this help clarify the misunderstandings and thanks for your prompt
> reaction and the patch that is now on pqm.

No problem.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4VtPMACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI1FggCfbNSBnRjSfryfPOIY+ZqklSW3
pfwAnRgoP8doMSjm4siHbD8oVx7QFVaA
=kiq4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----