root-ids changing for some merges
Aaron Bentley
aaron at aaronbentley.com
Thu Jul 7 13:30:33 UTC 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11-07-07 06:29 AM, vila wrote:
>>>>>> Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:
>
> > On 11-07-06 11:55 AM, vila wrote:
> >>>>>>> Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:
>
> >> > It's not helpful to repeat this without the *why*.
> >>
> >> Hence that test added at the end of the mail you're replying to so you
> >> can see for yourself: confusing and useless renames. I'd rather keep the
> >> root-id and avoid them completely.
>
> > Yeah, but the repetition isn't helpful. I already knew what you
> > wanted.
>
> Why asking then ?
I was asking for the why. I was making the point that "It changes
behaviour" isn't a good reason to revert a change.
You kept saying "it changes behaviour", which made no sense to me. I
expected it to change behaviour. I said it changed behaviour. You
approved it, having seen that it would change behaviour. And most
branches change behaviour.
> Hope this help clarify the misunderstandings and thanks for your prompt
> reaction and the patch that is now on pqm.
No problem.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk4VtPMACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI1FggCfbNSBnRjSfryfPOIY+ZqklSW3
pfwAnRgoP8doMSjm4siHbD8oVx7QFVaA
=kiq4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list