Commit extremely slow

[Martitza Mendez]

That's fair, John.  Rather than say they've solved it, I should say they
solved it by design...by not supporting sftp.  The smart server is better.
That said this remains a significant adjustment for people who want to move
from centralized to dvcs.  We all expect to pay more for the power of
dvcs...but we do not expect that cost to be a significant impact in our
development cycles.   Based on experience with git remote repos, I believe
bzr has significant opportunities.  And I am confident that bzr will
continue to converge on the best reasonably achievable real world
performance because of the efforts of you and the whole bzr community.

~M
 On May 26, 2011 7:09 AM, "John Arbash Meinel" <john at arbash-meinel.com>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/26/2011 04:04 PM, Martitza Mendez wrote:
>> This is consistent with my experience. Bzr has some issues with large
>> (medium?) projects which some other vcs systems have solved. I believe
>> the core devs will solve this. Meanwhile I find that breaking projects
>> into modules...like bzr and its pluggins...does help a lot. Good luck!
>>
>
> None of the other systems support remote repositories on an sftp
> service. So the specific issue he is seeing here isn't related, because
> the others just don't let you do that.
>
> John
> =:->
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk3eXvsACgkQJdeBCYSNAAMN8ACgyjThLxwvhI+8aYibOSJ/FR/5
> bWkAn3xEqtL7HlynY0hAuyIU7culq051
> =QAtE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20110526/4b9ab7bf/attachment-0001.html>