For how long should we retain Hardy support in our PPAs?

[Max Bowsher]

On 02/05/11 18:29, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> On 5/1/2011 12:02 AM, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> For how long should we retain Hardy support in our PPAs?
> 
>> My motivator for posing this question now is that I've just run into a
>> situation with preparing bzr 2.4b2 packages where I need to add a
>> backport of quilt to the bzr builddeps PPA and perform additional
>> debian/rules tweakage because of hardy's non-support for debian source
>> format 3.0.
> 
>> I'm guessing we're not quite ready to drop hardy support, given it's an
>> LTS, but I would like to open the discussion of when we would feel it's
>> appropriate.
> 
>> Max.
> 
> 
> I would say as long as we are considering backporting via SRUs, which
> I'm guessing is ~ as long as it is supported.

Uh.... hardy is on Bazaar 1.3.1. SRUs are out of the question.

Max.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20110503/5a36960f/attachment.pgp>