produce memory overhead in bazaar
Wouter van Heyst
larstiq at larstiq.dyndns.org
Fri Apr 22 18:03:25 UTC 2011
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:52:42 +0100, Lukas Diekmann wrote:
> Maybe you could save some memory (in this case 15% of total) by using
> intern()? I also did a total memory analysis. Here's an image of the
> ContainerAnalysis of Bazaar (checking out Exaile):
>
> hope image is supported by mailing list
>
> I hope this will be of some use for you. :)
Unfortunately the image got scrubbed, do you still have it available
somewhere?
Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 13:46:52 GMT, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> > The only problem with the test is that PyPy isn't compatible with our
> > Pyrex/C extensions. And while the pure python code always works, it
> > isn't 100% identical, and was certainly never tuned for memory or
> > performance. (It was tuned for readability, so that you have a reference
> > to crib from, etc.)
Pypy has implemented some parts of the C api, so possibly Bazaar's
Pyrex/C extensions would work already:
http://pypy.org/compat.html
Wouter van Heyst
More information about the bazaar
mailing list