Why 2 NEWS templates?

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I just started adding an entry in doc/en/release-notes/bzr-2.4.txt, and
I noticed that it was missing the vim line down at the bottom. I also
noticed that Vincent recently cleaned up a bunch of too-long lines from
Jelmer. (Which probably wouldn't have happened if the vim line was at
the bottom, since it tells vim to wrap at 74 chars.)

Then I saw that there is both:

  doc/en/release-notes/series-template.txt
  doc/en/release-notes/release-template.txt

With the only difference being:
- --- doc/en/release-notes/release-template.txt
+++ doc/en/release-notes/series-template.txt
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+####################
+Bazaar Release Notes
+####################
+
+.. toctree::
+   :maxdepth: 1
+
 bzr ?.?.?
 #########

@@ -51,3 +58,5 @@
    spurious test failures and changes to the way things should be tested.


+..
+   vim: tw=74 ft=rst ff=unix


^- A header, and the vim line at the bottom. Suspicious?



Anyway, I don't see why we would have 2 templates. My guess is maybe one
was added in old releases and got merged up without someone realizing
there was one already there with a different name?

It seems like we should standardize one way or another. I really like
having the vim line (though I really miss the encoding=utf8 that we used
to be able to use.)

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk098cgACgkQJdeBCYSNAAPf0wCfYdHngrj2Dgmlmqtb00u1SH+W
ZBMAn1kGzu3+td4LlGB3vpf5esWI6PMh
=/SuJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----