Weird failure of a merge to local branch

[Marco Pantaleoni]

I guess Mark intended that sync would be bidirectional: when it is
completed, both ends are updated with the changes from the other. At the end
of the operation they are identical, but both could have changed, while with
pull only one side changed.

Marco

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org>wrote:

> Mark A. Flacy writes:
>
>  > "sync" implies that both ends match when the operation is complete;
>  > therefore, I do not believe that it is a good description of the
>  > operation.
>
> You'd better report this docstring as a bug, then:
>
> $ bzr help pull
>
>    Purpose: Turn this branch into a mirror of another branch.
>
>


-- 
Marco Pantaleoni
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20101210/bc7ea052/attachment.htm