[john at arbash-meinel.com: Re: [long] bzr with wsgi and gunicorn vs Pylons (paste)]

[Adrien Saladin]

> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:39:06 -0500
> From: John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com>

>>> error\x01incomplete request\n is the smart servers way of saying there
>>> was a problem. The client code should be handling that and raising an
>>> appropriate error internally.
>>>
>>> So the question is why is pylons + whatever not returning the content,
>>> and instead erroring?
>>>
>>
>> But is this message part of the normal workflow. I thought the
>> question was "why does the bzr wsgi app returns an error message given
>> its input" ?
>>

> I'm not 100% sure what is wrong. However, it does happen for the server
> to return "there was an error" and have the client handle it.
>
> I'm guessing there is something wrong with a request, which is causing
> the server to return the generic error response. But at a minimum,
> you're not getting solid communication between the two, which hints at
> configuration issues.
>

Is there a way to get more verbose output from the bzr wsgi application ?
I tried to set enable_logging=True but this does not seem to change anything.

Also, is there a more verbose mode to the bzr client (or a plugin) to
get more informations about http traffic ?

Thanks!