2GB limit
John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Sat Oct 9 14:47:18 BST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/9/2010 12:24 AM, Maritza Mendez wrote:
> I think I have a solid way to reproduce the VM issue, without resorting
> to ulimit. (I'm concerned that ulimit may cause a non-problem to become
> a problem and so mask the actual problem.)
>
> Can someone confirm whether the trace attached is a definitive signature
> of the VM limit recently known as the 2GB limit? I want to make sure
> I'm looking at the right problem!
>
> Thanks!
> ~M
>
>
84.753 Adding the key (<bzrlib.btree_index.BTreeGraphIndex object at
0x02F73030>, 110895463, 93519167) to an LRUSizeCache failed. value
418921803 is too big to fit in a the cache with size 41943040 52428800
^- this looks like you are dealing with some very large content objects
(419MB for a single blob.)
...
File "bzrlib\groupcompress.pyo", line 538, in _prepare_for_extract
File "bzrlib\groupcompress.pyo", line 151, in _ensure_content
MemoryError
And this does look like it is failing during the zlib.decompress stage.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkywcmYACgkQJdeBCYSNAAMwwwCg2bWv9WSBju80HG5Z+K4g2nwR
BeEAoIAsexMDPH1h0kV81UzGTMzYe5zl
=CyUE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list