Bazaar and Visual Studio

[Alexander Belchenko]

Guy Gascoigne-Piggford пишет:
> I'm not at all sure that I agree with you here.  We're mainly a java
> shop here and use bzr all of the time.  When we gathered new devs to
> work on a .NET project, they put up with bzr and Visual Studio for a
> couple of months hating it's lack of integration and the migrated back
> to svn.
> 
> I'd say that you don't hear too many people complaining simply because
> they don't bother with bzr in the first place, they take a look at
> what it offers and decide that for Windows centric development (which
> generally means Visual Studio), there are simply better alternatives.

Completely agree.

> 
> Guy
> 
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Chris Hecker <checker at d6.com> wrote:
>> I would much rather have the bzr team deal with core features (performance,
>> versioned copy, large binaries, partial checkouts, etc) than mess around
>> with VS plugins.  Most serious developers I know turn off the VS integration
>> of p4 et al. anyway, and it's even less important for vcs's that don't lock
>> files like p4 does.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> On 2010/09/14 07:56, Russel Winder wrote:
>>>  From what I can see Visual Studio supports Team Foundation Server and
>>> Subversion.  There are also actively developed plugins for Mercurial and
>>> Git.
>>>
>>> Bazaar however has a plugin that hasn't been touched for 168 weeks
>>> lp:bzr-visualstudio.
>>>
>>> If this is the state of Bazaar support in Visual Studio then I'm afraid
>>> Mercurial and Git are the only choices for a very significantly large
>>> proportion of the code developers in the world :-(
>>>
>>> Am I missing something?
>>
> 
>