bzr 2.2 has gone gold

[Max Bowsher]

On 20/08/10 09:47, Martin Pool wrote:
> In the interests of getting coherent package sets faster and with less
> frustration, I'm thinking of getting only Lucid packages working
> first.

I've just had a manic uploadfest. Assuming everything builds, the PPA
should be close to up to date for everything, hardy jaunty karmic and lucid.

The exceptions are:
 * bzr-builddeb 2.5 can't build on hardy, unless we backport a newer
python-debian

 * bzr-gtk FTBFS on hardy, I've not looked at why

 * bzr-explorer and qbzr haven't been attempted on hardy

 * subvertpy 0.7.3 doesn't build with Subversion 1.5, so we're still at
0.6.9 on hardy and jaunty. but that's ok.

Also, I've created a wiki page to keep track of the status:
http://wiki.bazaar.canonical.com/ProposedPpaStatus

Max.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20100821/862fd5eb/attachment.pgp