Stable Loggerhead Branch

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

On 07/01/2010 11:46 AM, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> One thing I would mention. Do we want loggerhead to be its own app, or
> do we want it to be a bzr plugin. Right now the codebase is a bit split
> on how it wants to be run, and it means that stuff like "bzr serve
> --http" breaks from time to time because the devs don't run it from that.

	Well, I don't know that the distinction is that important--the plugin
glue is pretty small, and we can add tests to make sure that "bzr serve
--http" works just as well as ./serve-branches.

	Of course, it does require bzr, and it is somewhat tied to the bzr
version in use, but until there's a maintainability problem with having
it be both a plugin and program, I don't think it's a decision we yet
have to make.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.