bzr-svn, round 2 (was: Re: Sharing experiences...)

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Hi John,

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 06:10 -0400, John Szakmeister wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Martin Pool <mbp at canonical.com> wrote:
> > On 3 June 2010 07:27, John Szakmeister <john at szakmeister.net> wrote:
> >> BTW, it seems like Planet Bazaar is mainly Canonical folks.  Is that
> >> intentional, or it just that you guys happen to be the most vocal
> >> about Bazaar?  How does one go about getting another blog added?
> >
> > Just ask, anyone can be added.
> 
> I've never attached my blog to a planet feed before, are there any
> specific requirements?  If not, then would you mind adding me to it?
> My (currently limited) Bazaar posts can be found under:
>    http://www.szakmeister.net/blog/feed/category/bazaar/
Thanks for writing up your experiences with bzr-svn in such great
detail! I hope we can fix some of them and that it's ok if I reply to
some of the issues you raise in your last blog post here.

Setting push_merged_revisions = True will make bzr-svn push all
revisions into the remote repository. This will prevent any ghosts from
appearing (but requires you use a repository layout that bzr-svn
understands).

There seems to be some movement on the annotate with ghosts issue,
Philip Peitsch has been working on a fix. I've linked his branch to the
bug.

There is an open bug about the tags issue that you might want to link
to: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr-svn/+bug/309682 . However we
decide to deal with it should be easy to fix in bzr-svn, but there
doesn't seem to be consensus yet as to whether we should or should not
fetch tags that are not in the branch ancestry.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20100604/52181ed2/attachment.pgp