Any chance for a dcommit command?

[Stefan Monnier]

> I find that it's really nice to have a bound branch when integrating
> back into the mainline (it avoids the potential, uncommit, shelve,
> pull, unshelve, re-commit, push dance... or the rebase dance,
> whichever you prefer).  Unfortunately, if you want to commit into a
> foreign repo without the metadata, you can't use a bound branch.  You
> have to leave it unbound and use dpush.  Are there any plans for a
> dcommit command?

I wonder: why would a dcommit be needed?

Couldn't `commit' do the right thing (after all, contrary to `push',
when you do `commit' on a bound branch, there's no pre-existing
revision-id so you can really just pass the patch to the foreign DVCS
and then only create the Bzr revision by pulling from the DVCS).


        Stefan