Bzrlib updates of last evening appear to have created a bug in bzr-svn

Russel Winder russel at russel.org.uk
Wed May 12 09:49:59 BST 2010


On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 03:32 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
[ . . . ]
> So apport reports can contain a core dump, which contain private bits of
> information. So they get marked as private, and a separate batch job
> reads these reports, strips the core dump and gives a proper sanitized
> traceback, and then marks the bug public.

OK, given there are potential privacy issues the behaviour is sensible.
I wonder if there is a mechanism for making this behaviour more obvious
and/or known about -- or maybe it is and I just failed to know?

I guess either the process took longer than a few minutes in this case
or something went awry.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at russel.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20100512/341c1da8/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list