Loggerhead setting 'Cache-Control' header for static fields

[Robert Collins]

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Martin Pool <mbp at canonical.com> wrote:

> Sorry if it wasn't clear.  What we meant to convey is that during that
> week, about 60% of hits were for one single URL.  (Obvious caveats
> here that this week may not be typical etc.)  That URL should be
> highly cacheable and it should be fairly easy for loggerhead to know
> this, without getting into anything fancy.  At the moment it is not
> cached.  To me this is the obvious place to start: get in a squid,
> make loggerhead set headers, reproduce this case and check that it is
> in fact getting served from squid.

+1

-Rob