Dotted revno "algebra"

[Martin Pool]

On 3 May 2010 12:44, John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what makes you think that the revision object hash in the
> current format is cheap to look up. We can do it with a new index.
> Though we could do the same thing with the hash of the revision_id, and
> get one that is stable across representation changes...

Sorry, I thought that this was indexed.  I don't really have any good
reason for thinking that and in fact you did refer to this in a
previous thread.
-- 
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>