Revision of the tree after "revert -r"

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:03:01 -0500
> From: John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com>
> CC: bazaar at lists.canonical.com
> 
> You probably want to use "bzr update -r" to set the version of the tree,
> rather than "bzr revert -r". Revert changes the contents, but leaves the
> "last revision" of the file where it was.

Thanks.

The docs of these two commands should really be revised to mention
this.  Right now, "update"s docs talk only about "the latest code",
and say nothing about the possibility to use to do something similar
to "revert".  Also, "revert" does not mention "update" at all.