Dulwich on Launchpad

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at samba.org
Tue Mar 2 23:55:08 GMT 2010


On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 10:33 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> writes:
> > On 03/02/10 22:34, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > What is it about your personal setup that necessitates this? I've
> > > never had the need for rebase; branching and merging have met all
> > > the needs that people have cited for rebase, without the
> > > history-loss problems.
> > >
> > > Can you switch to using branching and merging for the same
> > > operations, at least on public repositories?
> 
> > Dulwich is maintained in parallel in both Bazaar and Git. Since
> > bzr-git doesn't support roundtripping yet, I have to dpush to get the
> > changes into Git.
> >
> > Usually I remember to dpush to Git before I push to Bazaar (so the
> > rebase isn't visible to anybody) but sometimes I forget, and I have to
> > push --overwrite later after I've dpushed to Git.
> 
> I might be missing something, but I don't understand how this answers my
> questions above.
Have you used dpush? It rebases.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20100303/0be30f6a/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list