Pushing after merge considered harmful

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Martin Pool <mbp at canonical.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:27:25 +1100
> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= <ofv at wanadoo.es>, 
> 	bazaar at lists.canonical.com
> 
> On 2 March 2010 07:37, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu.org> wrote:
> >> From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>
> >> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:23:45 +0100
> >>
> >> staying away from DAGs and Unique IDs just because they are CS
> >> concepts is doing little justice to the intelligence of the average
> >> reader, IMHO.
> >
> > That's what I claimed, too, but Bazaar docs developers disagreed.  So
> > I did what they asked.
> 
> It's been a long thread, but I don't think any bzr developers are
> asking you to baby-talk around these concepts.  However we should not
> assume the reader knows what a DAG is.

I thought I did just that, without baby-talking.  If you think I
failed, please point out where.