Dulwich problem

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Hi Russel,

On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 16:57 +0000, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 11:07 -0500, Andrew SB wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Russel Winder
> > <russel.winder at concertant.com> wrote:
> > > Jelmer,
> > >
> > > lp:dulwich  now points to bzr
> > > +ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/dulwich/trunk instead of
> > > http://people.samba.org/bzr/jelmer/dulwich/trunk is this intentional?
> > 
> > bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/dulwich/trunk is in fact a mirror of
> > git.samba.org/jelmer/dulwich.git
> On the one hand this seems like a good self test -- ensure that a Bazaar
> branch can be made from a Git repository.  On the other hand, I though
> Jelmer had said that his Bazaar branch was actually the master version
> and so shouldn't that be lp:dulwich.  Or perhaps things have changed and
> the Git repository is actually the master copy?
I push to both the bzr branch and the git repo at the same time, they
have the same contents so they could both be considered the master
branch.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20100214/13d3afe6/attachment.pgp