Pushing after merge considered harmful

[Alexander Belchenko]

Ian Clatworthy пишет:
> Martin Pool wrote:
> 
>> Another way to look at it: if append_revisions_only is set, the only
>> changes that will be allowed are those that mean 'bzr log' on the
>> branch before the operation is the tail of running 'bzr log' on the
>> branch afterwards.  You are not allowed to do operations that remove
>> revisions from the history, or that make things previously seen as
>> mainline then be seen as merged-in.
> 
> As Alexander points out, that implies uncommit is not supported on these
> branches. Otherwise, it sounds a good thing, particularly for trunk
> branches.
> 
> I assume we considered making this the default behaviour. What were the
> reasons against it?

I can imagine users of other dvcs will hate bzr for this default. But they don't have mainline 
paradigm anyway, so maybe it's ok in the end.