bzr push after bzr branch

Barry Warsaw barry at canonical.com
Mon Jan 18 14:38:53 GMT 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Jan 18, 2010, at 08:33 AM, John Arbash Meinel wrote:

>> Right, that's a great work flow for code branches, but doesn't make as much
>> sense for $HOME dot-file and /etc files.   Those branches are almost never
>> "branched-and-merged".  You just edit your files in place and then push them
>> to a remote location for safe keeping.  That push location is (so far IME)
>> always the same as the pull location.
>
>Why not use a checkout for it then?

You mean a lightweight checkout?  I suppose I should.  Can a heavyweight
checkout be converted in place?  (Well this is Bazaar, so I'm sure it can :).

- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLVHJ9AAoJEBJutWOnSwa/BXsP/020dMI1922UKDTunoJ2CxU8
3VHwk6hp7FMzvS0eVr0nLuWk3W9fc5lICL2QcMcd8RWMMpiNGnDGxOG752yziprr
DW6NNdaW7L98uqfPlMp1QAC0zHq57RHamXckCSER8FOnxn+KSFVe0pFoGLOm9OnN
DXnn/1RrhK2j33gDBTRtMO2udxOGzfgn5EdI+Wr6pEulrNuVYaZEZRnvV1uh4tsr
ZA+HyZAXxzH8z7Ywh16RKLtNmVRRkSN2Tia36l08vamV5L/fMDadf0jZoJZZgnpf
JaK9KRjbkukjABeQSuDyqMZslDwrVxqbrynBNTPwi5P6t+guuPOCG58Cg7BqKiUw
rqymEhGHxg2j1EtV5s4n2UyOSemWum7bdAMEErUkHxMEDSJZnbUKeUaVTt4epQ4d
NRfEXFGybTMnACcOUsQsz6PMyI55oCLTjuJ7xHHBjE/UMDygKLdWI+1EddO7Rf3Q
K6YXYD8D9rIVmqQYAwKL60Ix3JflAs4qOvvXv+Z4mQlGQwuSJoxb6/pwcs8jv+9v
ALq6sE0YtFNA2cR0YmtbhjpuUMkJzvW8eDXAlKbdnAzZn+BhJwVi1m2mx9hUrVQO
WTvFVeU0igR6IwYB0v9cwrZMfhrp8I++lczaETXhgotc8l/uRd6veGddpRN56T6V
J7nKdiyO2tJYPIq6Stv7
=9x9P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the bazaar mailing list