branch --bind or branch --bound?
Ian Clatworthy
ian.clatworthy at canonical.com
Mon Jan 11 05:37:23 GMT 2010
Eli suggested my proposed --bind option for branch be called --bound
instead. I don't mind either way. What would new users expect the option
to be called?
Is it:
* --bind (because branch --bind == branch + bind), or
* --bound (because it creates a bound branch)?
I don't want to bikeshed on this but I'll give it 18-24 hours before
making a call.
Ian C.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list