New public Graph.revision_relation method

[Martin von Gagern]

Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Of course, it may simplify the client API to provide a revision_relation
> method, but if you do, I suggest basing it on heads and using the logic
> described above.

That's what I had in mind.

And it's important to me that clients can express WHAT kind of
information they want (i.e. relation between revisions) without caring
about HOW the answer is calculated most efficiently (i.e. heads). Thus
the need for a separate API.

Martin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20091209/b402037f/attachment-0001.pgp